1 billion percent, I mean in 1994 they got the firearms act, then banned AR15’s, then handguns, then more rifles and then all the WW2 rifles and they’re still calling for more.
They will be coming for “rapid action” next and then eventually “single shot high velocity armour piercing death howitzers, because that one bullet is a WMD”
Donate to the anti-gun Polytechnique survivor group today and all your wildest dreams will come true. :/
When they all inevitably die of old age, will the organization switch to grifting the anti-aging fight next? It happened 36 years ago. Give it a rest at 40 or 50 please.
Or, let's start up a political lobby for the Bloody Falls Massacre of 1771. We desperately need to ban small skinning knives and the incredibly lethal assault bow's and arrows. Someone needs to think of the children.
It's worse than that. I think YouTuber BATS888 nailed it a while back. They go at this like they've unresolved PTSD and we're all psychos waiting to pop. Like some fanatical crusader, for them no lie, no misrepresentation no underhanded tactic is unacceptable or too far till the threat is gone.
They’ll start using “capable of sustained rapid fire” to ban them. Just like “assault style”, make up a word and use it so much that people that don’t know any better believe you. Just like “assault style” became just assault rifles “capable of sustained rapid fire” will just become “rapid fire” and it can cover what’s left that hasn’t been banned
434
u/[deleted] Apr 15 '26
[deleted]