r/canadaguns • u/AutoModerator • Oct 16 '22

Weekly Newbies & FAQ Thread - Post your questions here for PAL/RPAL application, timelines, CFSC/CFSRC, references & requirements, or general new to firearms ownership -type questions

This thread will be used for the "new"-type questions, PAL/RPAL applications, references, CFSC/CFRSC requirements, storage/transport, or other general "new-to-me" firearms ownership questions.

In response to this thread, the community was quite positive for a thread to cover these subjects.

These threads will be stickied for a week, renewing every Sunday @ about 0600 AST. Previous threads here. Take a look, your question may have been answered!

If you have any suggestions for this thread, please feel free to ask here, or send the Mods a message.

Thank you!

27 Upvotes

97% Upvoted

598 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

2

u/panzermeister36 Oct 22 '22

The borrowing is no longer allowed either. The official word is that "transfer" includes selling, trading, lending, etc.

1

u/[deleted] Oct 22 '22

Do you have a link for that?

1

u/Ordinary-Commercial9 Oct 22 '22

I'd be very surprised to hear that people are still allowed to borrow firearms in which they're no longer allowed to buy.

1

u/[deleted] Oct 22 '22

Why? There is a specific section in the firearms act addressing borrowing.

1

u/Ordinary-Commercial9 Oct 23 '22

Sure, but just because you have a license (let's say PAL for example) does not give you the means to legally borrow a restricted firearm.

This feels very similar, as I can't see the government saying "You aren't allowed to buy/sell/transfer a specific type of firearm, but you're willy-nilly allowed to lend that same firearm to friends who are not (as of the freeze) legally allowed to transfer the firearm into their name.

I guess we'll see! I'll be baffled.

1

u/[deleted] Oct 23 '22

Currently the text reads: "Authorized Lending Marginal note:Authorization to lend

33 Subject to section 34, a person may lend a firearm only if

(a) the person

(i) has reasonable grounds to believe that the borrower holds a licence authorizing the borrower to possess that kind of firearm, and

(ii) in the case of a prohibited firearm or a restricted firearm, lends the registration certificate for it to the borrower; or

(b) the borrower uses the firearm under the direct and immediate supervision of the person in the same manner in which the person may lawfully use it. "

Unless Bill c-21 will cause this text to change, it lending will still be allowed.

1

u/[deleted] Oct 24 '22

Further to my point, Ian Runkel (YouTube Runkel of the Bailey) stated his opinion is that borrowing rules are unchanged. I have not seen any evidence otherwise.