r/canadaguns 8d ago

News / Politics / Activism Media continues to lie.

After the shooting at the Toronto festival, multiple media outlets have reported that the Toronto Police Chief has called for “gun control” and “tougher gun laws” in response to what happened.

However, the reports are highly misleading and inaccurate.

He actually called for tougher sentencing for those who commit firearms offences, especially in crowds.

He said: “We need some reforms that address that and recognize that if you pull out a gun in a public space, in a public square or the Eaton Centre or any other public gathering and fire it indiscriminately, that should be treated with the utmost seriousness in the law.”

This is just one of many examples that prove how biased the media is. Everyone knows that “gun control” refers to laws restricting the acquisition, transfer and possession of firearms, not tougher sentences for things that are already illegal, everywhere.

Make no mistake, the media is not on our side.

489 Upvotes

125 comments sorted by

View all comments

241

u/BigPoppaPerks 8d ago

Confident a legal gunowner is not the perpetrator

85

u/SandySpectre 7d ago

If it was we’d have heard about it from poly already.

7

u/AceArchangel 7d ago

They're just as likely to lie about it though

8

u/Melodic-Street-8898 7d ago

Lets ban em allllllll and see if this shit stops

33

u/sorean_4 7d ago

Handguns purchases have been banned for few years now. Nothing changed, criminals are still criminals and don’t take laws seriously

1

u/wireditfellow bc 6d ago

Well if your laws are so relax that they feel like bad jokes. Why should criminals take them seriously.

2

u/sorean_4 3d ago

The laws are not relaxed. Tell me a country where criminals adhere to the laws and don’t break them. Wait….

-15

u/SandySpectre 7d ago

It’s not the purchase that’s been banned but the transfer. You can buy as many handguns as you want but you can’t get the transfer into your name. It’s a nit picky differentiation but when we talk about this stuff those detail matter.

11

u/Lumindan 7d ago

It’s not the purchase that’s been banned but the transfer. You can buy as many handguns as you want but you can’t get the transfer into your name

Except that's basically not the case since no one will sell to you without an exemption.

It’s a nit picky differentiation but when we talk about this stuff those detail matter.

The details do matter, the way you're framing makes it sound like joe smith can go to Cabela's and get one.

5

u/99spider 7d ago

No, this "detail" actually doesn't matter. It matters just as much as saying I can "buy" a machine gun or any of the OIC banned firearms from an appropriately licensed business, despite never being able to get it transferred to me.

1

u/sorean_4 3d ago

You can’t buy handguns period. If a weapon can’t be transferred to you it can’t be purchased. The only exception is .22 handguns for Olympic shooting for RPAL holders.

1

u/SpiritedKangaroo2576 4d ago

Reeeeeetttttaaaaaaaardddddddd

69

u/[deleted] 7d ago

[deleted]

29

u/Joeyjackhammer 7d ago

90’s? No sir. Revert back to the 70s.

12

u/Lopsided_Ad3516 7d ago

The 1470s?

15

u/Joeyjackhammer 7d ago

Your terms are acceptable

3

u/AnvilsHammer 7d ago

Just like the father's of Confederation intended?

9

u/dgod40 7d ago

Exactly....we NEED our silencers back. "Stop poaching" what a fucking crock!

20

u/Melodic-Street-8898 7d ago edited 7d ago

Lmfao ur totally right,they have it ass backwards and they are focused on the wrong thing here,they think banning all these legal guns is going to stop the issues canada has with crime,if anything i feel like "crime"will go up because ppl will just say screw it and start selling there NR'S on the street for tripple what they paid

6

u/KaeseKraimer 7d ago

Just revert to the firearms act - and put Ontario gun owners under OPP supervision. Keep it away from Feds. Lets get back to common sense

1

u/NorthwindX7 7d ago

They would say deal, then 8 years later keep them banned

1

u/BrightOrdinary4348 7d ago

Poly would absolutely jump on this. An 8 year ban would shutter all firearms related businesses. After 8 years, it would be impossible to restart the sport. Poly isn’t interested in public safety; they don’t want you to have fun with something that has been used in tragic events. By that metric, their goals would be accomplished.

I propose an amendment where not only are gun laws returned to their pre-2020 levels, but the government creates a program for another 8 years that heavily subsidizes (80%) startup costs for entrepreneurs who want to open ranges and gun shops. Also, all PALs/RPALs will continue to be renewed during the prohibition.

17

u/Agent_1812 https://youtu.be/mrAwb9ptu9U 7d ago

We should call for a ban to murder!

1

u/thingk89 7d ago

I’ve been saying that about cars for years… I mean, what if all the pollution goes away? We’ll be glad we banned them !

1

u/mustafazoom 7d ago

Yea in the one of the after math videos u can see a glock 26 with a prohibted barrel length beside one of the victims it was a shootout