r/canadaguns 11d ago

News / Politics / Activism Former Manitoba MP charged with gun offences, 439 firearms and antique cannon seized

Post image

https://www.castanet.net/news/Canada/624511/Former-Manitoba-MP-charged-with-gun-offences-439-firearms-and-antique-cannon-seized

Firearms seen in this undated photo were part of a firearm trafficking investigation where a 78-year-old man was arrested in Dauphin,

Man., on July 7, 2026. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Handout - RCMP (Mandatory Credit)

Mounties say a former Manitoba member of Parliament is facing several gun offences after 439 firearms were seized from a home in Dauphin, Man.

Inky Mark, 78, faces a dozen charges, including firearms trafficking.

Police say they began investigating in March after another man from Dauphin, who is 73, was charged with firearms offences in the U.S.

Search warrants were executed last week at the Manitoba home, where officers also seized an antique cannon and $300,000 in cash.

Mark was elected under the Reform Party in Dauphin-Swan River-Marquette in 1997 and didn't seek re-election as a Conservative MP in 2010.

He has been released from custody.

287 Upvotes

160 comments sorted by

194

u/Medical_Bluejay_7506 11d ago

Dude had an antique cannon🫪

76

u/voodoopriest 11d ago

Yeah I though it was kinda funny they put so much emphasis on that.

51

u/HatchingCougar 11d ago

No PAL needed for that 

Yet of course its included for emphasis in the article

101

u/Blue_ech0 11d ago

They mentioned trafficking, so I bet that's what got him on the radar

55

u/kefefs_v2 11d ago edited 11d ago

Yeah, especially since it says he's facing US charges as well.

I misread the article. Mark isn't facing US charges, it seems another local man is. That local man was tracked after a handgun was stolen from a US gun show, and he led the cops to Mark, who bought illegal guns from him.

9

u/Hot_Cheesecake_905 11d ago

But what did he do in the US? Did he try to import a couple of parts and get flagged for ITAR violations? That would constitute trafficking.

15

u/kefefs_v2 11d ago

Looks like I misread the article, it's not the ex-MP who's charged in the US too. Seems Mark bought stolen/smuggled guns and possibly other "prohibited devices" from another local man accused of stealing a handgun from a US gun show and smuggling it and other guns into Canada.

1

u/CyberEd-ca 10d ago

There is nothing in the article that confirms the firearms Inky bought were smuggled.

You don't have a reference number from the CFP for those three shotguns you bought? That's trafficking...

1

u/kefefs_v2 10d ago

It's in other articles, like the BBC one.

0

u/CyberEd-ca 10d ago

No, I don't think so.

Here is the article.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/crr8gggwe8zo

Nothing says Inky Mark got caught with firearms that had been smuggled from the USA.

If I'm wrong, please show me where.

2

u/kefefs_v2 10d ago

That investigation led RCMP to find and seize firearms allegedly purchased by Mark, which police said were "never lawfully transferred".

At least three firearms are believed to have been illegally trafficked and one firearm had its serial number tampered with, officials said. They also found more than C$300,000 (£158,000) in cash at the home.

-1

u/CyberEd-ca 10d ago

Look at what trafficking in.

That doesn't have anything to do with "smuggled".

Any otherwise lawful transfer but without the new CFP transfer number requirement is "trafficking".

You are reading in things that are not there.

1

u/gspotcowboy 10d ago

Brother the literal definition of arms trafficking is "the illegal smuggling, distribution, or sale of weapons, ammunition, and munitions across international borders"

→ More replies (0)

2

u/CyberEd-ca 10d ago

Inky just bought some guns from another guy - perhaps Inky didn't get a reference number.

Then this other guy got caught up with something and they had some records from the firearms registry, etc. "What happened with this or that" and Inky got fingered and now the police come to Inky's house and don't like some things he has going on there.

It really doesn't take much...

3

u/TheDumbestDonut 11d ago

The guy you're referring to is Wilfred Kachurowski

1

u/CyberEd-ca 10d ago

By "illegal guns" they probably mean they didn't get a reference number.

I am skeptical this is anything more than an attack by zealous police on an old man.

2

u/kefefs_v2 10d ago

Doesn't sound like it. At least three of the guns were stolen/smuggled and one had its serial removed.

-1

u/CyberEd-ca 10d ago

It doesn't say they were stolen or smuggled.

It says three firearms were "trafficked". If you don't get a reference number, that's trafficking.

Also, it is not clear that it was one of those three firearms that they think maybe the serial number was removed. That could have been any of the other 400+ firearms. Further, just because they think a serial number was intentionally removed doesn't make it so. It's not like they have done any lab work or had any expert examine it yet.

You are reading things into the article that are not there.

27

u/mwmwmwmwmmdw 11d ago

the "trafficking" in question sounds like he bough non-restricteds from a guy he didnt know where stolen and should have been more diligent on their origin when buying.

24

u/EnvironmentBright697 11d ago

How the hell is someone supposed to know if something was stolen or not?

33

u/mwmwmwmwmmdw 11d ago

if the buyer has a valid pal and doesnt raise any red flags during the sale there really isnt a way to know.

5

u/FriendZone_EndZone 11d ago

$300 000 in cash not suspicious?

14

u/mwmwmwmwmmdw 11d ago

he is also a bit of a kook from what ive heard. and im guessing doesnt like or trust banks possibly

18

u/Renace 11d ago

Just a tad unhinged.

21

u/Claus-Buchi 11d ago

Being into conspiracies but pro Israel is one of my favorite combos ever

1

u/CyberEd-ca 10d ago

Ah, so that's what this is maybe actually about...

1

u/Dependent_Account603 11d ago

Don't have to be a cook to not trust banks. Banks don't have bank run insurance for no reason.

4

u/sorean_4 11d ago

No. It’s not. It’s legal tender. How much you have in the house, it’s no one’s business. What suspicious about money? For some 10k might be a lot for some having a million in large bills is a small change.

2

u/AdministrationOk1083 11d ago

My parents have more than that in golf and silver, then close to that in cash

2

u/CyberEd-ca 10d ago

Not really. Lots of older guys have money.

I bet a lot of older farmers that have accumulated over a lifetime have similar amounts just in case they run into a land deal opportunity one evening.

1

u/exposethegrift 10d ago

Not at the parkland area of mb

1

u/Spezner 11d ago

Not for a 78 year old and frozen bank accounts

7

u/SecureNarwhal 11d ago

and also has $300k in cash lying around???

20

u/specificallyrelative 11d ago

Don't dig in a very specific spot in my yard if that is crazy. Some people don't trust banks.

2

u/exposethegrift 10d ago

Agreed and as which that part of mb the mistrust of banks stem from the economic depression and the generational teachings remain

3

u/exposethegrift 11d ago

Inky has a teachers pension and a member of parliament pension

1

u/CyberEd-ca 10d ago

He also had a business. Presumably some farm land, etc.

6

u/HatchingCougar 11d ago edited 11d ago

For Many, if not most who can afford 438 (non beater / bubba’d & heavily worn) firearms legitimately etc

300k isn’t that much 

1

u/CyberEd-ca 10d ago

There is no law against that.

Lots of valid and sufficient reasons to have $300k in cash.

3

u/l3luntl3rigade 10d ago

Currently you're correct, but there's a bill making its way through the motions that the federal government is currently trying to make that against the law.

Christine with the Canadian Constitution Foundation on YouTube has a piece on it.

Basically the government wants you to have an itemized/receipted record of any amounts over $10,000, or it will be seized by police (until you can provide proof of ownership of every dollar there).

The government says its to "help them stop crime."

Attacks to freedom on all fronts in this country

1

u/CyberEd-ca 10d ago

That's crazy.

Section 7 of the Charter is completely useless.

2

u/l3luntl3rigade 10d ago

"eLbOwS uP tHo"

Disgusting what this country has become tbh

2

u/CyberEd-ca 10d ago

They didn't have to even be stolen or related to this trouble the other guy has with the USA.

If that other guy mentioned he sold some firearms recently to Inky and there is no CFP transfer number, that's trafficking.

1

u/CyberEd-ca 10d ago

Says who they were stolen? Maybe they just didn't get a transfer number.

3

u/Dill_Pickle_Tears 11d ago

He’s tied to a US citizen who was involved in similar charges in the same city

45

u/Murray3-Dvideos 11d ago

RIP to all the irreplaceable historical pieces that will be smelted.

41

u/Projectflintlock 11d ago

He’s got some nice antiques 😆there’s a 1879 Springfield Trapdoor in the pic ffs

11

u/Hotdog_Broth 11d ago

I see the martini and the snider (or something similar), but where’s the trapdoor?

28

u/Dirk_Speedwell 11d ago

Inky Mark sounds like the killer from an urban legend made up to keep idle teens away from hanging out by the wharf.

44

u/Mysterious_Sleep7443 11d ago

13

u/goodfleance 11d ago

That'll tally your ho, boys

2

u/Drakkenfyre 10d ago

Oh my God, that looks like the kind of cannon used in a field gun run competition. That's the one where you disassemble it and use ropes and acrobatics to get across.

37

u/Cock_ball_dickin 11d ago

Free my goat

School walkout for this guy

/s (he was smuggling)

12

u/[deleted] 11d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

7

u/Free-Tradition5459 11d ago

Smuggling arms which one should be able to legally possess, but it arbitrarily restricted from doing so, into an oppressive state is pretty based actually.

2

u/jwubadubdub 11d ago

2

u/NeruLight 10d ago

Free Mr. Mark!

3

u/black_covfefe_please 8d ago

This makes me think this whole thing is more political than real.

7

u/jwubadubdub 11d ago

Koona t'chuta Solo?

-RCMP (Probably)

3

u/CyberEd-ca 10d ago

There is no allegation that Inky Mark was involved with "smuggling".

An illegal transfer is "trafficking". So , all it takes is not getting a transfer number from the CFP.

Smuggling involves cross-border criminality.

From the BBC article:

That investigation led RCMP to find and seize firearms allegedly purchased by Mark, which police said were "never lawfully transferred".

3

u/CyberEd-ca 10d ago

They don't even allege that he was smuggling.

1

u/Cock_ball_dickin 10d ago

Damn, free my goat then

3

u/CyberEd-ca 10d ago

You laugh, but two old guys making an otherwise legal sale for firearms but they didn't get a transfer number - that's trafficking.

It takes very little.

16

u/snasna102 11d ago

Well gunpost just got a little quieter probably

8

u/handen 11d ago

Switzer's is about to have one hell of a fall auction though.

16

u/Sunray21A 11d ago

Was the Cannon loaded with Grape shot?

"Tally-ho lad's!"

Just as the Fathers of Confederation declared.

2

u/lee--carvallo 11d ago

Let's not forget chain shot. Can't invade Canada if you don't have a mainmast!

1

u/Sunray21A 11d ago

I did enjoy destroying rigging in SeaDogs.

And using Power Drive on your Putting Challenge. Many a ball went in the parking lot.

8

u/Mysterious_Sleep7443 11d ago

28

u/CallMeSirJack 11d ago

I have several firearms with "tampered serial numbers", or I'm sure the RCMP would claim as much, even though they are milsurps where they had drilled through the serial number for scope mounts and other modifications long before serial numbers became standard in Canada.

3

u/CyberEd-ca 10d ago

Exactly.

The fact the police think there is an issue with it doesn't mean much. They get a lot wrong.

8

u/heavydutydan 11d ago

The mention of the cannon reminds me of that copy pasta that you see now and then. Ill try to find it and paste it here:

"I own a musket for home defense, since that's what the founding fathers intended. Four ruffians break into my house. 'What the devil?' As I grab my powdered wig and Kentucky rifle. Blow a golf ball sized hole through the first man, he's dead on the spot. Draw my pistol on the second man, miss him entirely because it's smoothbore and nails the neighbors dog. I have to resort to the cannon mounted at the top of the stairs loaded with grape shot, 'Tally ho lads' the grape shot shreds two men in the blast, the sound and extra shrapnel set off car alarms. Fix bayonet and charge the last terrified rapscallion. He bleeds out waiting on the police to arrive since triangular bayonet wounds are impossible to stitch up. Just as the founding fathers intended."

Sorry for the formatting, I'm on mobile and I had to find and copy/paste this. It always makes me laugh. Anyways, yeah...cannons.

6

u/SixEyeSassquatch 11d ago

Quickly seize his retirement fund! 🤣

16

u/Whispersfine 11d ago

So what’s the next move? Limit the number of firearm you can own like Australia? Where is this going?

24

u/zetagundam12 11d ago

The move is: I hope to god the Supreme Court slaps around the Liberals and their OIC next month cause the amount of "GunsScary" posts I've seen recently is concerning

19

u/Whispersfine 11d ago

CBC is coming from all angles, painting us like gangsters.

2

u/CyberEd-ca 10d ago

And some of those are on this sub...

7

u/GoGetInvolved 11d ago

Poly is already saying one person having that many guns is a public safety risk.

5

u/IntroductionPrior289 11d ago

How you can only hold 1 maybe 2 at a time
They are actually Brain dead

3

u/Beneficial-Ride-4475 11d ago

If anything comes of this guys foolishness, it will likely be new storage requirements I'd wager. Hopefully that's not the case though.

4

u/Whispersfine 11d ago

I got a weird feeling it’s definitely more than that.

1

u/Beneficial-Ride-4475 11d ago edited 11d ago

It's possible. I'd really have to look at what guns to cull if we do have restrictions implemented, and that idea hurts me.

18

u/ABT653 11d ago

He's got my vote lol

3

u/varsil Firearms Lawyer (Verified) 11d ago

I'll happily take on his file for the seized cash.

...and the cannon.

3

u/NeruLight 11d ago

Me, if I had too much money/time/space. Well minus the crime and yard signs I guess.

3

u/TescoValueSoup 11d ago

Former MP … and NFA Director lol

6

u/Purple-Character8206 11d ago

There's a Facebook group called save the CBC and a whole lot of people in the comments are really putting emphasis on the fact the guy was a Conservative politician. Hasn't been listed in politics since 2010.

2

u/IcySkyDream 11d ago

Gotta remind them of the LPC's SNC Lavalin scandal. Politicians are scummy, generally speaking.

1

u/BeerAndOil 11d ago

Meanwhile he unsuccessfully ran for office in 2015 as an independent but a card carrying member of the greens.

4

u/snakeleather45 11d ago

This old ass dude was probably selling off his collection and sold the wrong gun to the wrong person. Like an "prohib" ag42b to some dude with an expired pal.

9

u/hunterofsteelhead 11d ago

What did he do wrong?

17

u/throwaway11100217 11d ago

The mention of another man being arrested in the US makes me think these guys were gun runners.

6

u/AnvilsHammer 11d ago

Probably WeJogGuns I've heard so much about.

1

u/CyberEd-ca 10d ago

There is no evidence Inky Mark was involved with that.

Could be as simple as they made a recent deal on some unrelated firearms but didn't get a CFP transfer number.

20

u/Mapledeepstateagent 11d ago

Smuggling presumably

14

u/hunterofsteelhead 11d ago

Its wierd how they didnt focus so much on what he did wrong.

13

u/Mapledeepstateagent 11d ago

Not particularly. It’s pretty standard that the police will only release as much information for the media to report on as strictly necessary.

When a crown prosecutor is picked and court dates set you’ll probably find the specifics you’re looking for.

14

u/hunterofsteelhead 11d ago

Unless it suits their narrative like when they started the whole 2020 bans because of the NS shooting releasing information they werent supposed to during an ongoing investigation in order to cause fear in the public to support their bans

8

u/Scary-Detail-3206 11d ago

They conveniently forgot to release that the NS shooter was a RCMP informant on their payroll, oops!

7

u/hunterofsteelhead 11d ago

Im not sure if they proved he was an informant its just that he withdrew money in a way that was extremely suspicious and informant like. They also let him escape from their cordon and refused to alert the public he was dressed like an officer in a vehicle that looked like an officers car. He was on the phone during the shooting and nobody knows who he was speaking with

6

u/hunterofsteelhead 11d ago

I just dont believe it anymore when they point and yell witch

0

u/The_King_of_Canada mb 11d ago

Its a weird site that op linked.

9

u/iatekane 11d ago

It seems that he purchased some guns from another guy who was smuggling stolen firearms from the US into Canada

-1

u/cubiclejail 11d ago edited 11d ago

Ya think! Wonder where that $300K in case came from. Probably not from smuggling guns. 🙄

It's ok to say what he did was wrong!!!

Haha, jokers in here downvoting me.

2

u/hunterofsteelhead 10d ago

Its wrong to take the feds word on anything without seeing evidence and facts presented. They have a long dark history. Its not illegal to have 300k in cash and you dont need to assume where it came from.

1

u/hunterofsteelhead 10d ago

That investigation led RCMP to find and seize firearms allegedly purchased by Mark, which police said were "never lawfully transferred"

1

u/hunterofsteelhead 10d ago

Let them present their case about this. Because its all assumptions and speculation now until we know facts

1

u/The_King_of_Canada mb 11d ago

Gun smuggling from the states. He had a couple hundred thousand presumably from smuggling.

2

u/CyberEd-ca 10d ago

Big presumptions based on nothing.

1

u/The_King_of_Canada mb 10d ago

Read the article.

2

u/CyberEd-ca 10d ago

Do you know the difference between trafficking and smuggling?

In the most recent article, Inky says he didn't do the transfer properly.

If you don't get the new Bill C-21 CFP transfer number, then an otherwise lawful transfer is now "trafficking".

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/inky-mark-police-firearm-seizure-9.7269890

2

u/Due_Statistician1679 11d ago

Fellas, we gotta up our game.

2

u/IcySkyDream 11d ago

Pouring one out for those beautiful AR15s that will be cut up. :(

3

u/CyberEd-ca 10d ago

More context:

Inky says it had to do with a transfer. Maybe they didn't get the CFP transfer number.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/inky-mark-police-firearm-seizure-9.7269890

3

u/Big-Guitar-1979 11d ago

Free this old man

2

u/NeruLight 10d ago

The more I read the more I think that’s the only logical conclusion. National treasure!

1

u/tghost474 11d ago

I wonder how he voted…

3

u/jwubadubdub 11d ago

Unverified*

1

u/LuckNo2351 11d ago

antique what?

1

u/BCURANIUM 11d ago

He was keeping illegal guns off the streets? confused about what the real issue is.

1

u/CyberEd-ca 10d ago

This could have all been due to legal firearms not transferred per the new law.

It doesn't take much...

1

u/Papabandit_ 9d ago

God forbid a guy have hobbies I guess.

-10

u/cubiclejail 11d ago

Scumbag!

2

u/hunterofsteelhead 11d ago

What makes you say that?

17

u/throwaway11100217 11d ago

If they were trafficking firearms it sure makes us legal owners look bad. Dude was a former Conservative MP, so just gives the anti-gun folk more ammo to use on the population that just think guns = scary.

6

u/ManyArmedGod 11d ago

Was he a conservative MP?

“Mark was elected under the Reform Party in Dauphin-Swan River-Marquette in 1997 and didn't seek re-election as a Conservative MP in 2010.”

5

u/hunterofsteelhead 11d ago

Yes im just hesitant to believe the feds after all theyve done. Did he actually smuggle and traffic firearms or are they just stamping that onto something he did to paint him a villain?

1

u/CyberEd-ca 10d ago

Trafficking could be as simple as not getting a CFP transfer number in what was an otherwise lawful deal between two license holders.

8

u/1882greg 11d ago

Probably the allegation he was smuggling.

1

u/CyberEd-ca 10d ago

There is no such allegation.

3

u/cubiclejail 11d ago

Did you read the article?

5

u/DwayneGretzky306 11d ago

Unfortunately in Canada the average adult reading level, is Level 2 which corresponds to Grade 6 to Grade 8

5

u/hunterofsteelhead 11d ago

They talk more about him being a mp, his amount of firearms , his cash and his cannon more than what he actually did wrong

4

u/mwmwmwmwmmdw 11d ago

he got slapped with charges that have been well discuessed on here as being catch all things they put on gun owners they don't like.

up until recently anyone involved in a self defence shooting with legal guns always got slapped with unsafe storage since you where technically unsafely storing said gun when you where using it to not die.

1

u/cubiclejail 11d ago

So you think that they charged a past Member of Parliament with a slew of bogus charges because they don't like him? Riiiiiiiight.

Also, nobody brought up self-defence shootings. The article lists multiple allegations that have nothing to do with using a firearm in self-defence. 🙄

3

u/leaf_shift_post_2 11d ago

He’s done nothing wrong

2

u/cubiclejail 11d ago

5

u/leaf_shift_post_2 11d ago

Trafficking guns for personal use isn’t really a crime imo.id vote not guilty on a jury for this dude all day long.

-1

u/hunterofsteelhead 11d ago

Yes. Did you read my question about what made you say that?

0

u/Drakkenfyre 10d ago

The police will criminalize anyone they don't like.

-5

u/Current-Speed4096 11d ago

let me guess, a former conservative mp

-27

u/BearlyDraconic01 11d ago

A great LaW aBiDiNg conservative right here

13

u/lanteenboy 11d ago

Do you own firearms or are you just trolling through?

Haven't seen anyone alleging that Conservatives are more law abiding but Canadian gun owners certainly are, on average.

How about we let the guy have his day in court first before you and the rest of Poly try to use this to show how the problem is firearms owners and not career criminals?

2

u/GinnAdvent 11d ago

Nah, we got bunch of 4 months accounts posting random stuff here just to get people riled up.

Another guy was saying if the firearm he turned in for the confiscation program need to include the magazine...

I am sure they include those in the instructions, or a quick call to the program hot line would answer the question. But nope, gotta ask people in a gun sub that totally against gun confiscation.

So how many law abiding Liberals out there that aren't landlords and taking advantage of the current house price to jack up the rent and trying to keep up the property value eh? Perhaps we should ask Gregor Robertson?

How many law abiding drivers out there that dont exceed the speed limit and ran red lights? I am sure the number of infractions giving to firearm owners are way less than driving license holders annually.

0

u/BearlyDraconic01 11d ago edited 11d ago

I am indeed a licensed gun owner, and am aware that we are statistically much less likely to commit crimes. I was not criticizing him for being a gun owner (except for the trafficking and illegal ones).

I just think it's funny that a member of a party that likes to champion "law and order" was not living up to their stated values. I'm sure this is only a one-off though, and there are no other corrupt hypocrites and/or criminals within the ranks of the CPC.

But what do I know? I'm one of what seems to be very few Canadian gun owners on this sub that does not reflexively vote conservative for the single issue of guns while their policy plans in every other area would be even worse than Carney's.

2

u/jwubadubdub 10d ago

"But what do I know?"

Very little it seems.

Inky Mark spent his parliamentary career with Canada's conservative movement, serving as a Reform, Canadian Alliance, Progressive Conservative, and later Conservative MP. However, he became increasingly critical of Stephen Harper's leadership, left the Conservative caucus after accusing it of becoming overly centralized, and later joined the Green Party before running as an independent in the 2015 federal election.

He hasn't been associated with cons for over a decade. He has however been very vocal against the CCP and their outsized influence on CDN politics.

2

u/NeruLight 10d ago

He’s one of those real ones: an old stock conservative, and I fully support this guy based on his flags alone.