r/canadaguns • u/Alternative_Two475 • Jun 19 '26
Feets / Collection / My build The Things That They Would Deny Us....
My fightlite Mission Configurable Rifle has sat idle for 6 years now, and counting. Notwithstanding the rifle's appearance here fitted with a "belt" of plastic dummy rounds with rubber links, it is legally fired using 5 round magazines or 5 round mini-belts and is semi-automatic only. It is merely another semi-automatic AR15 variant with a unique (and quitefascinating) dual-feed system. No need to get overly excited, there Poly.....
11
u/cdnmalkav Jun 19 '26
Come on, its just for plinking....
9
u/hafetysazard Jun 19 '26
I thought they were for holding while sitting on the couch when you watched your favourite action flick?
8
7
u/Substantial-Onion-92 Jun 19 '26
I didn't think we had round limitations on belt fed firearms in Canada. Maybe that's just for the old MG34s, M1919 etc. with no magazine options.
12
u/Alternative_Two475 Jun 19 '26
Full belts only apply to pre-1942 Links/Non-Disintegrating Belts.
5
u/Substantial-Onion-92 Jun 19 '26
Perfect thanks for the clarification. So after firing these 5 round mini belts they completely disintegrate?
4
u/Alternative_Two475 Jun 19 '26
Yes
5
1
u/Relevant_Diver_3228 Jun 20 '26
How much do they cost to replace after they disintegrate and could you still buy the ones that don't disintegrate
4
u/EngorgedGorilla Jun 20 '26
You can reuse the disintegrated links. They don't vaporize, they just come apart and land on the ground.
5
5
u/Eglitarian Jun 19 '26
This has me thinking how awesome would it be to have a belt fed .22LR cope gun.
3
u/davidc538 onterrible Jun 19 '26
Wut, is that a belt fed weapon that’s subject to magazine restriction
5
u/Alternative_Two475 Jun 19 '26
Yes, it is dual mag/belt feed, so mag limits apply. TBH, the 5round limit would apply anyways, even if it were belt-fed only...
3
u/OrientalSells95 Jun 20 '26
I mean if the Jeetskis Skidoos in places like Toronto, Calgary, Vancouver are managing to somehow get Dracos, extendos and other cool stuff that us law abiding citizens cant get, I dont see why we cant be as equally as resourcesful LOL
4
u/Barbarian_818 Jun 19 '26
As I've said before. The Anti-Gun movement is as much about eradicating gun culture as it is protecting the public. They're just very careful to never say that because that would arguably be a Charter rights violation.
Nathalie Provost and company are convinced that gun culture breeds Right wing violent extremists. (I see it the other way around. Violent extremists are drawn to guns as a means to impose their views) So they are on a Holy Crusade to erase gun culture as a sweeping approach to coping with extremism.
That's why anything "tactical" is high on the list of banned weapons. Not because a .22 with black furniture is especially deadly, but because they are convinced that anyone who wants one is intent on murder practice.
So, with that in mind, this rifle hits all the buttons. If this was really a belt fed select fire weapon like it appears to be, it certainly would appeal to someone who dreams of "making Them all pay'.
This is Scary Black Rifle personified.
5
u/thecoolernameistaken Jun 19 '26
The govs lying around the reason for the bans. We know they’re lying. They know they’re lying. Therefore logically we can assume they have anterior motives to disarm us.
Long story short we need MORE
4
u/Barbarian_818 Jun 19 '26
The problem is; the urban Liberal rank and file, especially in Quebec, don't know they're lying.
As I've said recently to some very left wing folks in face 2 face convo: It's real easy to say we need more gun control when you have no idea how much gun control we already have.
Unless it's a subject that actually affects them, voters all over the spectrum have only a passing knowledge of most political topics. That doesn't stop them from having opinions mind you. You can totally invent a headline and ask a random person in the street and they will instantly form an opinion based purely on that fictitious headline. If you know the uninformed opinions the public has, it's easy to turn that to political advantage. (Classic Discworld "Headology' )
The people making firearms policy know almost nothing about actual firearms culture. And they are put into power by people who know even less.
And it's also easy to say that saving hypothetical lives is worth sacrificing sport shooting and recreational hunting when it's not you losing your hobby and property rights.
2
u/Possible_Thing_9385 Jun 19 '26 edited Jun 19 '26
Agreed, to a certain extent, although I would suggest that a pump-action shotgun with a 6-round magazine would also appeal to someone with lethal ill-intent. For that matter, ANY multi-shot firearm would appeal to someone fixated on committing lethal, mass-violence of the sort that you describe (eg. "Making them all pay").
If this is really "scary black rifle" personified, then good - I suppose that I chose well in selecting a particular "trigger"! Poly want a cracker?!?
2
u/gnu_gai Jun 20 '26
Frankly someone looking to cause a mass casualty event will use literally anything they can get their hands on. Plenty of random public attacks with machetes, bottles of acid, motor vehicles, homemade bombs, etc.
1
1
-33
u/SadisticChipmunk Jun 19 '26
I mean... This is awesome. I would own it for sure.
But it's also a prime example of what we don't need lol.
20
u/JustWrongdoer801 Jun 19 '26
Nah, thats real cuck way of thinking... a man should be able to buy whatever the fuck he wants and make it look however he wants. Dudes soup up thier cars in ridiculous ways all the time, it's just property, still with a license and still a being handled responsibly by the owner. I'd argue we actually need more of this!
11
14
u/yummybunnybear Jun 19 '26
Human existence isn't needed either if you want to be nihilistic about it. Everything is a "want" since the premise of existence itself is a desire
9
10
8
4
6
23
u/NeruLight Jun 19 '26
Looks cool I dig the optic setup too