r/canadaguns Apr 08 '26

Gun and gear reviews CZ 600 vs. Ruger American Ranch 7.62x39

Which one is better?

13 Upvotes

60 comments sorted by

16

u/HappyCan7250 Apr 08 '26

I have a CZ600 alpha in 7.62x39 and it is a nicer rifle than my Ruger Americans. I still really like my Americans, but in terms of build, trigger and accuracy, I say the CZ600 is a bit better.

That said, I'm mainly referring to the Alpha model, the Trail model only has a 2moa guarantee on it, and guys report anywhere from 1-3moa with it.

The trigger on the CZ is much better.

But, I still love my RAR in 5.56, and I have a predator in 308 as well and enjoy them 

1

u/AtmosphereOk9982 Apr 08 '26

Thanks

3

u/CryptidWorks CryptidWorks Apr 09 '26

Resident trail nut here:

The .223/5.56 trail is very picky with ammo (specifically, bullet weight), and the 7.62 less so - that said, the accuracy is directly proportional to the quality of the ammunition you feed it.

My 7.62x39 is about 2.5-3MOA at 100 with Czech surplus, 1.5-2.5MOA with Chinese, 1.5MOA with S&B soft points, and will shoot bug-hole 0.5-1MOA groups with either handloads or federal power-shoks.

All of the above are 123 or 124gr projectiles, as almost all 7.62x39 is. The quality and nature of the propellant is likely making the most difference, affecting both velocity and standard deviation.

I am currently working on a load for 150gr Hot-Cor projectiles, as the power-shoks use the 124gr variant, and a 150gr load would have little bit more effective range (albeit also using a rather spicy powder charge.)

9

u/i-Hermit Apr 08 '26

Don't forget Howa.

1

u/AtmosphereOk9982 Apr 08 '26

thanks

3

u/i-Hermit Apr 08 '26

I have a Howa mini in 762x39.. if I had to do it over again I'd get the CZ, but primarily because the factory folding stock on the Howa was absolutely terrible. A Howa in the oryx chassis would be a different story.. I ended up buying a oryx for the rifle because the factory stock was so bad.

1

u/Iokua_CDN Apr 15 '26

Sorry to hear the hoea folding stick sucked!  Was it the Excel stock ???

I do enjoy my cz trail a Lotz though  I was shocked as the recoil and blast from the 16 inch barrel. Totally different than my 20 inch sks. I didn't think the few inches less would make a difference but it's quite different.

That being said, the folding stock on the Trail also kinda sucks. Wobbly  unless you mod it or put a buffer tube adaptor and a different stock on it

1

u/i-Hermit Apr 16 '26

The folding stock was on the Howa.

1

u/Iokua_CDN Apr 16 '26

Yeah, what I was asking was if it was the Excel stock  on the Howa?  Actually. Its called the mini excl stock, and looks like this

https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSJMFoH5Yw089NDjNrwCtwdBa6p7yXkobI7zGa0hyJa42qWuc4DISMmOLP_&s=10

I only ask because I've noticed that howa as a decent alternative to the CZ trail, but if the stock sucks,  then I won't mention it to other folks

2

u/i-Hermit Apr 16 '26

Yeah, that stock is the one that sucks. But maybe it's fine if you want a compact bush gun? I use it as a bench gun.. so it sucked for that.

1

u/Iokua_CDN Apr 16 '26

Really good to know!!!  Thank you :)

5

u/Special-Tadpole7395 Apr 08 '26

I have a CZ600 AMERICAN in 7.62x39. everything about it is awesome and high quality. I love it.

1

u/Iokua_CDN Apr 08 '26

Ooo that wood stock looks amazing! Does yours have Iron sights on it??

1

u/Special-Tadpole7395 Apr 08 '26

It is amazing haha. No I don't have irons. I had to add a scope

3

u/Murray3-Dvideos Apr 08 '26 edited Apr 08 '26

I bought a CZ Lux in 7.62x39 and now sortov wish I'd held out for the new Rugger Scouts that take AK mags. They will basically offer everything I wanted from the LUX but for potentially 400 cad less.

That said the LUX is easily the nicest bolt action I've owned to date.

2

u/fishinguy44 Apr 08 '26

I’ve seen the lux around $1200 you think the scout will go for $800?

2

u/Murray3-Dvideos Apr 08 '26

Paid 1400 for the LUX

2

u/Iokua_CDN Apr 08 '26

Cz 600 alpha vs Ruger ranch

I suppose the Ruger has a shorter barrel by 2 inch if you care about  compactness.

However, the CZ is cheaper. I believe the CZ is  better quality.  Better trigger. Better accuracy.  I'd go 600 Alpha all the way.

Even magazines, the Ruger mini 14 mags suck, so you have to go Lar mags.  The  CZ has a stock  5 round mag, but you can also buy 3d printed 12 round mags for cheap.

Now Cz 600 Trail vs the ruger.

Price is now more competitive. There are still trails on sale for 990 I believe.

Mags are now similar. 5 round proprietary mags. Both you can get the adaptors to run  LAR mags.  There is talk about a cz 600 trail proprietary mag from another redditor here, which would put a nice bonus for the CZ trail if you could get 20 round mags for it.

Barrel length is the same. Cz wins for overall length as it telescopes. CZ wins with  the full rail  making mounting irons better, or scopes. The trail also wins with mlock adding plenty of flex for accessories. Accuracy goes to the Ruger though.  Trail Is lacking on Accuracy unless you swap out the stock for a folding stock or something. The "Stock" stock has some wiggle.   Though honestly I question if the Ruger is better. Is the ruger a 1 moa gun in 7.62 x39? If not, then accuracy is the same for them.

So all in all, what do you want?

Do you want a combat rifle, that's easy to add iron sights to?   Get the cz trail.

Care less about compactness, but want better accuracy, or are on a budget? Get the CZ 600 alpha.

Either way I wouldn't get the Ruger unless you could get an amazing deal on one.  The days of $600 dollar Ruger Ranch guns are sadly over and ruger doesn't have the same value 

2

u/Hopeful_Relation_441 Apr 08 '26

for what's its worth i have the trail in .223 its action is buttery smooth compared to the ranch i tried.. also 223 comes with a 10 round mag and takes ar pmags

1

u/Iokua_CDN Apr 15 '26

How are you finding the stock on the trail? I've read of folks putting shrink wrap on to take out the wiggle when it's fully extended

2

u/Hopeful_Relation_441 Apr 19 '26

it does wiggle not gonna line,, that said i am able to hit 6 inch plates at 100 regularly with a bipod

it came with a back plate mounting for a buffer tube style stock

its really fun i recommend a break as the barrel is short, but yeah not a sub MOA rifle

1

u/Iokua_CDN Apr 19 '26

I'm thinking about a break. First time shooting it, I was shocked st the blast compared to my sks (I have the 7.62 x39 version of the trail)

Like noticeably louder, more blast and more recoil. I guess the old 20 inch barrel heavy sks soaks up the recoil pretty good

1

u/Hopeful_Relation_441 Apr 20 '26

try different ammo... Hornady Black is less fireball lol

2

u/LOTW_FurFeathersFish Apr 08 '26

Have a gen1 ranch in x39 and it’s awesome. Shoots any and all ammo very well. Love the short barrel. No issues with cycling and the bolt does smooth out after a few hundred cycles.

All that said, I’m sure the 600 is a nicer overall firearm. I’ve owned CZ rimfires and the quality for the price was incredible.. but I don’t think the CZ could be any more accurate than the ruger.

I like the heavy barrel on the ruger as it helps to balance the short length. Factory threaded is a nice touch.

2

u/DougMacRay617 Apr 09 '26

Cz is the nicer rifle by a mile

2

u/FluffyPlays22 Apr 08 '26

CZ 100% ruger qc is going downhill fast.

1

u/FireteamOrcale Apr 08 '26

I recently bought a Ruger American Gen 2 in 7.62 and it’s been fantastic so far, the quality on its great and haven’t had any issues. I’ll have to do some more testing but I’ve been really enjoying it.

1

u/FD4L Apr 08 '26

Cz is probably better out of the box. Unfortunately they seem have very little aftermarket support.

If I got a ruger ranch, id probably wait until black friday, put it in an mdt lss3 that takes ar magazines and run 10-round LAR pistol magazines.

Id love to have a similar option with the 600, but it just dosent seem to be available anywhere.

1

u/fishinguy44 Apr 08 '26

Try to find a Cz 527

1

u/Vikare_ Apr 09 '26

They're quite expensive now. 1400-1500. They were 2/3rds that years ago. Are they worth it at that price? Genuinely curious.. I'd love to own one.

1

u/fishinguy44 Apr 12 '26

Can find them less than that and yes they are worth it

1

u/newtoabunchofstuff Apr 08 '26

RAR Gen 1 in 7.62x39. My experience is it shoots fairly accurately using corrosive ammo.

I also printed a mag adapter so it can use AR15 mags, which permits 10 round XCR mags. I don't know if this is doable with the CZ.

1

u/arecus25 Apr 09 '26

I have the 1st gen ruger american in 7.62x39 and it does the job as far as a bolt action goes. I threw mine in an MDT LSS chassis so I could put on my own pistol grip and buffer tube + stock with cheek riser.

They don’t make AICS 7.62x39 magazines for the gen 1 compatible chassis but I found that 10 round 6ARC AICS magazines can fit 6-7 rounds with some slight modifications to keep the bullets from dipping down into the mag.

Works great as a practice rifle and shoots roughly 1MOA with spam can ammo and since it’s a bolt action cleaning is way quicker. Even as a base rifle it shoots really well but ultimately up to you if you want the CZ to shoot out the box or the American to tinker and customize down the road.

1

u/Neat_Imagination2503 Apr 09 '26

I have both but in 223. Tiger and build quality on the Cz are significantly better. I also put the RAR in a Magpul chassis and it weighs considerably more then the cz

1

u/Snipez9999 Apr 09 '26

I own a Ruger American ranch gen 2 in 7.62x39. And would say to probably get a CZ, definitely better quality, howa mini wouldn’t be a bad option either though. The Ruger was by far the cheapest option though importing it from the states

1

u/GlizzyDog222 Apr 10 '26

Not to be that guy but you’re right there in the Tikka Lite budget range which would be much better choice.

1

u/AtmosphereOk9982 Apr 14 '26

7.62x39 ?

1

u/GlizzyDog222 Apr 14 '26

Yeah it was like 4am when I saw this post lol my bad

0

u/ovjho Apr 08 '26

Did we all forget about not supporting CZ? How is this even a question anymore?

7

u/Mysterious_Sleep7443 Apr 09 '26

Thats all overwith

They made a statement that they are not supporting the Liberals with destruction

-1

u/real_draft Apr 09 '26

Can they be trusted?

-6

u/[deleted] Apr 08 '26

[deleted]

2

u/Murray3-Dvideos Apr 08 '26

Its crazy how much the sentiment on CZ has changed in the last 6 months.

1

u/Sweetchildofmine88 Apr 08 '26

And that too with false information.

1

u/NecessaryRisk2622 Apr 08 '26

Not really crazy, I have a hard time supporting a company that’s lined up to help disarm Canadians. Edit, …regardless of their current position on the subject.

1

u/Murray3-Dvideos Apr 08 '26

Except the f CZ comment was being downvoted lol. Which seems to be the new norm now opposed to Oct last year.

1

u/NecessaryRisk2622 Apr 09 '26

It’s Reddit, after all.

0

u/-rifle-is-fine- Apr 08 '26

They lost my trust. Their responses to inquiries were very short and vague.

Nobody thinks they are participating in the confiscation as they keep stating they are not. I have yet to see any response from them to those point blank asking if they entered a contract to destroy guns for the Feds. Silence.

For those browsing: Nothing from the Feds either. https://www.ourcommons.ca/written-questions/45-1/Q-219?expandquestion=true

1

u/sounoriginal13 Apr 08 '26

Its wierd and unexplicable. The whole buyback thing pissed me off. Then i found out about the new stocks for the ranger rifles was colt. At a cost of 1257 cad per rifle. Even tho they initially sold them the rifles.

Original C-19 Purchase: The initial contract for the rifles themselves was worth $32.8 million.

Total C-19 Program Value: With the additional stock replacement cost, the total expenditure for the Ranger rifles has risen to roughly $41.6 million.

Im still sour bout it, dont own any cz, i like the cz trail but that was my deciding factor. I mentioned a week or 2 ago "obligatory fuck cz" and reddit informed me i was wrong by the 10+ downdoots. Strange, i dont know why it swung the other way lately.

1

u/sounoriginal13 Apr 08 '26

Oh and the cost per rifle after stocks replaced will be about 6k each. Compared to 14k each to take ours away i guess thats a steal.

-2

u/In7018wetrust Apr 09 '26

FUCK CZ.

Have yall forgotten that they’re participating in the liberal gun confiscation program? Don’t support a company that wants to sell you a firearm that they profit from taking away.