MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/canadaguns/comments/1se0z69/finally_tally_for_the_asfcp/oemj75w/?context=3
r/canadaguns • u/rastamasta45 • Apr 06 '26
215 comments sorted by
View all comments
89
[deleted]
31 u/Cope180-Enjoyer Apr 06 '26 How dare you use the L word. You don't deserve accountability and the truth. -Liberals 12 u/mywaaaaife Apr 06 '26 No. We work for the government now. It’s like 30% of the workforce it’s insane. 8 u/Mo-Cance Apr 06 '26 67,640 plus Nunavut. So yes, more than 67,000. At least they didn't round up to 68,000. It's glazing, sure, but I don't see a lie presented here. 1 u/[deleted] Apr 06 '26 [deleted] 1 u/Mo-Cance Apr 06 '26 Probably because there's always a potential for variance in the counts. Nunavut posted "less than 10." BC is showing a suspiciously round number, which may not be 100% accurate.
31
How dare you use the L word. You don't deserve accountability and the truth.
-Liberals
12
No. We work for the government now. It’s like 30% of the workforce it’s insane.
8
67,640 plus Nunavut. So yes, more than 67,000. At least they didn't round up to 68,000. It's glazing, sure, but I don't see a lie presented here.
1 u/[deleted] Apr 06 '26 [deleted] 1 u/Mo-Cance Apr 06 '26 Probably because there's always a potential for variance in the counts. Nunavut posted "less than 10." BC is showing a suspiciously round number, which may not be 100% accurate.
1
1 u/Mo-Cance Apr 06 '26 Probably because there's always a potential for variance in the counts. Nunavut posted "less than 10." BC is showing a suspiciously round number, which may not be 100% accurate.
Probably because there's always a potential for variance in the counts. Nunavut posted "less than 10." BC is showing a suspiciously round number, which may not be 100% accurate.
89
u/[deleted] Apr 06 '26
[deleted]