r/canadaguns Mar 12 '26

News / Politics / Activism Stand on Guard - Conservative Party of Canada

https://www.conservative.ca/stand-on-guard-2/

The bill makes important changes to Section 34 of the Criminal Code so that force is presumed to be justified if used against an illegal intruder. Conservatives first announced the ‘Stand on Guard’ principle back in August, asking the government to introduce legislation in the fall session.

270 Upvotes

235 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

0

u/The_King_of_Canada mb Mar 13 '26

Their food affordability act got shot down by the Liberals

Because it was just a name for a bill to cut all taxes that was designed to fail. Just like this bill. They don't give a shit about affordability they just want you to think they do.

It's funny how you demand and stamp your feet that the conservatives do something then when they do you go

Because the names for their bills are not the same as what the bills actually do and they're doing it in bad faith. If they were serious about lowering food bills they would go to the LPC and start talks and come up with a bi-partisan plan. But they don't because they don't actually care and they just want to stomp their feet and complain for sound bites and campaigning.

Stop reducing my arguments to PP bad or CPC bad. I have valid points to make and you know it.

3

u/Lumindan Mar 13 '26

Because it was just a name for a bill to cut all taxes that was designed to fail. Just like this bill. They don't give a shit about affordability they just want you to think they do.

Care to point out where in the act is was designed to fail or are you just going to regurgitate the same talking points?

People like you are never happy, the conservatives table things, you cry about it. They amend things, you cry about it, they let things pass, you cry about it.

Because the names for their bills are not the same as what the bills actually do and they're doing it in bad faith. If they were serious about lowering food bills they would go to the LPC and start talks and come up with a bi-partisan plan. But they don't because they don't actually care and they just want to stomp their feet and complain for sound bites and campaigning.

Thats what the affordable foot act was, they also amended and worked with the Liberals on the gst cut because it was better then nothing, you're so blinded by your hatred it's not even funny, it's sad.

Stop reducing my arguments to PP bad or CPC bad. I have valid points to make and you know it.

I'm not reducing your arguments, You've done a fine job outting yourself. I just pointed out the obvious.

The Cpc gives us token shit like this when they dont have to worry about politics

Oh please. Its token month where the CPC pretends we exist.

Seriously? Look at the polls. Everyone loves Carney. PP isnt even popular with his party he just has a death grip on it and his inability to change or let go is costing us.

Fuck the CPC man.

That took me less than 5 minutes to scroll through the thread. You're so partisan locked it's unreal. Half of your comments have been PP bad and CPC bad, all the points you've made aren't even grounded in fact. They're based on your feelings. I don't quite care how you feel, but I do care you're spreading objectively wrong information.

3

u/AdeptArt Mar 13 '26

Guys I am all for civil debate, just try to make sure this doesn't spiral out of hand. I'm not going to remove this or any of the previous replies but please, no name calling going forward. I have to point out that u/The_King_of_Canada did not partake in any personal attacks. Try to keep disagreement civil & respectful, please and thank you (and this goes for everyone else reading this reply).

2

u/Lumindan Mar 13 '26

I'm done with it.

If they want to spout misinformation, they can do it all they want. I took a shot at debunking their rampant partisan takes. If I've broken any rules you guys can take appropriate action. I'd like to think I've been incredibly civil given the contents of this thread.

3

u/AdeptArt Mar 13 '26 edited Mar 13 '26

This was precautionary more than anything. My personal take is I would rather you focus on addressing the points (which you have been doing well, btw) rather than the person (like calling him blinded by hatred, which may or may not be true but isn't strictly relevant either way). But nothing here crosses the line so don't worry about that.

Just because I've seen these things devolve into online shouting matches (and then we issue warnings/bans and nuke the thread) I wanted to put out a reminder in advance.

Thanks for your understanding.

edit: Also, just to be clear, this is no way meant to be a message targeted towards just you. I appreciate the civil response to my message. This is true for everyone else on the subreddit. We keep disagreements civil (like adults) and avoid resorting to personal attacks.