r/canadaguns • u/BSDTerra • Feb 27 '14

Swiss arms reclassified as prohib

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=586051418129625&amp;set=a.347336092001160.74391.347295135338589&amp;type=1" data-width="466"><div class="fb-xfbml-parse-ignore"><a href="https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=586051418129625&amp;set=a.347336092001160.74391.347295135338589&amp;type=1
83 Upvotes

93% Upvoted

207 comments sorted by

View all comments

6

u/Vascilli KABLOOIE! Feb 27 '14

Without the LGR how will they be able to find the owners?

13

u/Jobbo_Fett Surplus Lover Feb 27 '14

Some people are saying that the RCMP has actually kept the data, with allegations that the High River Gun Grab was based on that information.

-12

u/[deleted] Feb 27 '14

Some people are saying that the RCMP has actually kept the data, with allegations that the High River Gun Grab was based on that information.

Where do you come up with this absolute bullshit?

9

u/Jobbo_Fett Surplus Lover Feb 27 '14

Woah, I must've pulled this entire video out of my ass. And Solomon Friedman is on my pay roll

Oh holy fuck, another video about the same topic. Solomon Friedman and I are bed buddies, but he'll deny those allegations in court ;)

-2

u/OxfordTheCat Feb 27 '14

Oh, well, if Solomon Friedman said it, it must be true...

He doesn't have an agenda at all..

2

u/Jobbo_Fett Surplus Lover Feb 27 '14

And yet, I still haven't seen a single link, post, article, video, blog, vlog, message or other object that would try to prove him wrong.

1

u/OxfordTheCat Feb 27 '14 edited Feb 27 '14

... you mean aside from all the numerous government statements, news articles, television pieces, and even court cases regarding the destruction of the data, and the confirmation of such?

Hardly any coverage at all, what when compared to an iron clad source such as a Youtube video and a guest spot on an Sun News opinion segment.

"Firearms advocate and lawyer who makes his living from firearms related issues seeks continued publicity, and makes reactionary claims about firearms on television network notorious for hosting reactionary claims! Film at 11"

2

u/Jobbo_Fett Surplus Lover Feb 27 '14

And yet I still haven't received a link from you, which makes it very hard for you to support your claim with actual evidence. And at this point, you're starting to look very silly.

0

u/OxfordTheCat Feb 27 '14 edited Feb 27 '14

I'm surprised you didn't have time to find it yourself, but you were probably busy refreshing 4chan looking for more gifs.

Here you go

Take as much time as you like.

2

u/Jobbo_Fett Surplus Lover Feb 27 '14

I couldn't take all the time I needed, google was going too fast. Do you have any other pretentious mouth-breathing to effect towards your monitor today or are you done for now?

0

u/OxfordTheCat Feb 27 '14

I'm not exactly sure what your end game is:

You're demonstrably wrong, and yet all you do is post gifs and go with personal attacks.

I'm confused: What are you trying to achieve by being a jackass?

0

u/Jobbo_Fett Surplus Lover Feb 27 '14

Except for the fact that the LGR isn't completely dead which has been shown to be the case with Quebec and their desperate attempt to keep that information alive. November 21st seems to be the last date mentioned and no information seems to come out with regards to if the data will be expunged or not.

Also, it's pretty hilarious that I always seem to be the jackass but not the people who accuse me of such things. Funny world we live in huh?

1

u/nikobruchev Feb 27 '14

November 21st seems to be the last date mentioned

I think I saw some articles from June 27, 2013...

0

u/OxfordTheCat Feb 27 '14 edited Feb 27 '14

Quebec fought to not destroy the data, and they lost the court case if I recall.

Also, it's pretty hilarious that I always seem to be the jackass but not the people who accuse me of such things.

Are you carrying on in the same way when that happens?

Because 'if the shoe fits', as they say:

You're calling people names, going with personal attacks rather than addressing any actual topic, and posting GIFs from the 4chan / Digg 'Hall of Fame Reposts' list instead of, you know - replying.

It's outright immaturity at best, but I think if you have a look back at you'll see some shades of jackass as well.

Just isn't necessary. People are allowed to disagree about things.

Meandering back to the original item - All I'm saying is that Friedman shouldn't exactly taken as gospel. The guy makes his living on advocacy and firearms law, and he has a bit of a vested interest, and him going on Sun News and claiming something doesn't make it the truth.

→ More replies (0)

-15

u/[deleted] Feb 27 '14

I'm not even bothering with this one.

You're a wing nut.

6

u/Jobbo_Fett Surplus Lover Feb 27 '14

Here, I saved this one just for you

5

u/mwmwmwmwmmdw Feb 27 '14

dont worry about it him and oxfordthedouche are well know for trolling this sub and only seem to show up in the political threads to act smug and accrue downvotes

4

u/Jobbo_Fett Surplus Lover Feb 27 '14

We've been over Oxfordtheasshat and Adipleasegivemeattention before, and I might as well give them a piece of their medicine. Because, after all, trolling is a cry for help.

0

u/OxfordTheCat Feb 27 '14

You do realize that people having an opinion that differs from yours isn't trolling, but what you are doing in this thread is, right?

2

u/Jobbo_Fett Surplus Lover Feb 27 '14

You do realize that AdiposeFin has said some of the dumbest things ever recorded on this sub-reddit and is subject to comparison with trolling, right?

1

u/mwmwmwmwmmdw Feb 27 '14

thats fine. but you dont need to smear on a thick layer of smug while doing it

-7

u/[deleted] Feb 27 '14

Christ on a crutch... you're trying to cite Sun Media.
Done. Ignored. Goodbye.