r/canadaguns 19d ago

Shooting Is this fairly “accurate” for 200 yards

Post image

I’m new to shooting and still trying to understand moa’s and all that. These 4 shots were taken in 40 seconds and from my understanding is about 1 moa apart on each? Is that a good grouping for a hunting rifle. It’s a 30-06, should I adjust my sight any further or just leave as is?

46 Upvotes

32 comments sorted by

42

u/BeerGunsMusicFood 19d ago

Looks like you’re a bit above 1 moa but most people are. I’d adjust 1/2 moa down and 1/2 moa right and call it a day. If I were looking to hunt out to 200 yards I would take that group all day.

9

u/conanap 19d ago

I wouldn’t do 1/2 moa right; most of his shots are centered left to right, it’s more likely that one shot was an outlier.

3

u/84camaroguy 19d ago

I think you’re likely correct. The real answer is to let the barrel cool and pump more rounds into that target, if OP wants it exact.

2

u/illknowitwhenireddit 19d ago

Probability would suggest you're correct, but I wouldn't assume anything. OP could be a savant

37

u/briancatams 19d ago

Hey it's pretty dang accurate by my standards lol

19

u/Yankee_on_vanisle Van Isle 19d ago

If its Iron sights off hand : Great/excellent!
Iron Sights and benched : Very Good / Great
Scoped and off hand: Good / Very good
Scoped and benched: Pretty good

In all seriousness

Listen, it'll smoke a deer or larger with no issues, If that's what you are gonna do come hunting season, I wouldn't be upset.

A Deer has a vital zone the size of a dinner plate, a moose or elk is even bigger.

It looks like you and your rifle are doing their part, now you just gotta learn to listen to the woods.
Congrats!

6

u/RasShotan 19d ago

Will it kill a deer or moose, yes.
Is it “accurate”, no.

3

u/SexiTwink 19d ago

It’s 2 legged predator accurate

2

u/NIBLZ_HAMSTR 18d ago

Yup... that Bigfoot or yeti ain't messin with nobody now.

7

u/LongRoadNorth 19d ago

Is this with iron sights?

It's a bit over 1moa. What ammo? What barrel length? Are you aiming at the centre the whole time?

-2

u/DryF1re 19d ago

"I’m new to shooting"

why would this be iron sites?

11

u/illknowitwhenireddit 19d ago

Because a lotmof new shooters can't afford both a rifle and a scope and rings

1

u/DryF1re 19d ago

aint no way a new shooter is taking their .30-06 200yards on iron sites AND hitting these shots.

0

u/LongRoadNorth 19d ago edited 19d ago

Honestly that was my thought too but saying adjust my sight and not adjust my scope/optic threw me off.

Either way at 200 yards if the point of aim never changed and that was the way it grouped that's less of an optic issue, more of an ammo/shooter skill level.

0

u/Dependent_Account603 18d ago

Scopes nowadays seem to be cheaper than ironsights.

5

u/Scary-Detail-3206 19d ago

This is good enough accuracy for hunting, barely over a MOA.

You’ll get a better group if you shoot a bit slower. Give it 40s-1 min between shots to let the barrel cool down a bit.

Also consider trying some different ammunition. This is what my groups look like at 200 yards with most loads. If I switch over to the ammo my gun shoots best, the groups are tighter by default.

.

2

u/Blue_ech0 19d ago

That group @ 200 yards is pretty decent with a "hunting rifle".

A couple characters showed up at a rifle sight-in day at the local range. I forget what they were shooting, but they touched every corner of an 11x14" target @ 100 yards, called it good enough and packed it in.

Yours won't win any competitions, but it'll drop game.

1

u/No-culture5942 19d ago

I think its fine. What magnification did you use on the scope?

1

u/SoundGeek97 on 19d ago

Definitely shooting "minute of deer" there my friend! In time you'll get it to tighten up, but yes this is good enough for hunting.

1

u/JurboVolvo 19d ago

Could hunt at 200 with that group.

1

u/-FingerOnTheTrigger- 19d ago

What kind of gun is that? May be as good as that gun can shoot.

1

u/tmwildwood-3617 19d ago

Yup...fine for hunting big game.

MOA is approximately 1" at 100 yrds, 2" at 200 yrds, etc...

You didn't say what scope. Obviously it's harder to shoot consistenly if you aren't picking a precise aiming point. Are you able to aim and hold precisely enough to discern 1/8 or 1/4" at 200yrds?

Didn't specify which hole was which shot in the string. As your barrel heats up the barrel harmonics will change and affect your point of impact. So if you're locking in on that 1st shot consistency then you may want to let the barrel totally cool off between shots. But definitely worth knowing what your rifle is doing if you had to bang off shots quickly.

1

u/Wiggum13 19d ago

It all depends what your goals are. Hunting, this is great. Prs comp, lots of room for improvement.

1

u/Orcasystems99 18d ago

All kill shots... well done.

1

u/Regular_Doughnut8964 14d ago

Accuracy is relevant to the mission of the rifle. If your rifle is for hunting in <200 meter shots you have adequate Accuracy. If you are thinking of 1000 yard DCRA competition then it is left wanting. A bench rest or sniper rifle should put 5 rounds in the same hole with the group measuring under 2 times bullet diameter. A heavy caliber rifle for short range (50 meters or less) is considered accurate enough if it can hit a saucer 3x. There are many ways to tune and accurate both rifle and ammo, but the one using the trigger is generally the one that needs the most adjustment.

1

u/BigheadReddit 19d ago

That’s a good group for 200. If you were hitting that consistently, ie. a similar group 3 or 4 times, I’d come right and down a bit like equivalent to 1/2 inch each. But, even if you didn’t you’d drop an animal if you aimed at the vitals for sure.

0

u/MasterScore8739 19d ago

For a newer shooter with something as ‘heavy’ as a 30-06, I’d say this is pretty damn good.

My only advice would be to try and focus a little more on breathing. That’s usually what will cause your shots to have that vertical stringing.

Try to take a deeper breath, let about half of it out and hold it there. Give yourself about 1-2 seconds with that half breath to get a shot off. If you can’t, exhale and take a couple normal breaths and then try again.

For an average hunting rifle I’d consider 1MOA about as tight as can be expected. If you have the money to spare, maybe try a bullet that’s a bit lighter and then a bit heavier than what you shot this group with. It might not change much, but you might be able to squeeze an extra 1/4MOA out of it.

For scope adjustments, personally I’d leave them as is. The majority of hits are vertically cantered. The hit to the left is what I’d consider a flyer in this case.

-6

u/BowFella 19d ago

That's like 2-2.5moa. if your gun is a 1.25moa gun you are pretty much at the limit of it's capability.

2

u/MasterScore8739 19d ago

This was shot at 200 yards, each square is 1”, at most it’s vertically ~1.25MOA. Horizontal it’s basically 1MOA or close enough that it’s splitting hairs.

-5

u/BowFella 19d ago

Basically what I was saying but less retarded. I was saying 2-2.5moa at 200.

1

u/Regular_Doughnut8964 14d ago

Accuracy is relevant to the mission of the rifle. If your rifle is for hunting in <200 meter shots you have adequate Accuracy. If you are thinking of 1000 yard DCRA competition then it is left wanting. A bench rest or sniper rifle should put 5 rounds in the same hole with the group measuring under 2 times bullet diameter. A heavy caliber rifle for short range (50 meters or less) is considered accurate enough if it can hit a saucer 3x. There are many ways to tune and accurate both rifle and ammo, but the one using the trigger is generally the one that needs the most adjustment.