8
u/BeerAndOil 5d ago
Hear me out. A pattern 1907 bayonet. 17 inch blade.
5
u/escv_69420 4d ago
Bayonet longer than the barrel is based. Turn it into a glaive with a carbine attached.
4
4
u/fitdirk 5d ago
What’s the mag extension?
6
u/-DirtyCanadian- 5d ago
I found the file online and printed it. It serves no purpose other than looks
7
3
u/CloneFailArmy 5d ago
Assert dominance on intruders
“My mag is bigger than yours it hangs to the floor bitch”
3
u/shamone94 5d ago
Looks awesome!! Where did you get the brass deflector? Need to get one for my Makasi
5
u/-DirtyCanadian- 5d ago
I designed and printed it. I can make one specifically for the Makasi if people want it
3
3
u/New-Replacement-2352 5d ago
Parts list?
6
u/-DirtyCanadian- 5d ago
- Henry Supreme with 10.3” barrel
- Ranger point handguard & stock
- PMAG with printed baseplate extension
- Printed brass deflector
- Printed extended mag release
- Holosun AEMS
- Geissele Super Stabby bayonet mount
- USMC OKC 3S bayonet
- Magpul handstop
1
1
u/escv_69420 4d ago
Hey OP since you've got a line on these rad Shield Supremes, I've got a question for you:
You reckon there's enough meat on the sides of the receiver to machine the grooves for an MRX magazine to fit? That would be really cool, and not even sus because it is a manual action after all.
3
u/-DirtyCanadian- 4d ago
The magwell is actually wide enough to accommodate the MRX mags without any receiver modification. Although they do not fully insert due to two the wider parts of the mag hitting the internal rail.
It surprisingly still feeds when pushing up mag. This means if the rails were modified it should work just fine.
The mag is so close to being able to lock in.
1
u/escv_69420 4d ago
That's awesome! is it the upper part by the feed lips that fouls, or just the ribs? If the latter, a bit of trimming of the ribs could make it work and it still wouldn't fit in an AR.
2
u/-DirtyCanadian- 4d ago
It is just the ribs. It should work if the ribs were trimmed down a bit, although not sure of the legality of that.
Does anyone know the legality of that? I know modifying a receiver is ok, but modifying a mag is a bit of a grey area
1
u/escv_69420 3d ago edited 3d ago
I reckon it aught not to be an issue as long as it definitely still can't possibly chamber in any semis. whittling the tops down by like 3mm wouldn't change that, or really be noticeable. Considering it's going into a manual action firearm too, you'd be modifying one manual action magazine for an other manual action rifle so it's not even in the "ummm well actually officer..." territory like machined out semi receivers.
Option 2 is making a super thick, fat boy mag body that fits exactly into the well of the Supreme, uses STANAG followers and springs, but is too girthy to fit other STANAG mag wells. Shield could make it and sell it as a Supreme specific, Canada legal 20-30rd mag.
1
1
u/zaphodbssecondhead 13h ago
I want to see an accuracy test with this RDSC barrel. It should be more accurate due to less flex. My supreme is already <.5 at 100m with 73gr match with the stock barrel, so I’d be curious to see result with this.
-2
9
u/Hopeful_Relation_441 5d ago
its soo angry!! i love it