r/canadaguns Jun 20 '26

News / Politics / Activism CANADIAN COALITION FOR FIREARM RIGHTS, RODNEY GILTACA, RYAN STEACY, MACCABEE DEFENSE INC. and WOLVERINE SUPPLIES LTD. v Canada

https://www.scc-csc.ca/pdf/case-documents/41859/FM010_Appellant_Canadian-Coalition-for-Firearm-Rights.pdf?fbclid=IwY2xjawSjj-BleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZBAyMjIwMzkxNzg4MjAwODkyAAEeANXl0iXLYQJAzWAacwJ3jlAPA2JwySXYmO2kdN61vIzfl36nYz2DnLqmuZU_aem_KMNtV2EKNmsPofG7UrsqMA

This is the written argument to be heard by the Supreme Court of Canada by the CCFR and associated parties v Canada. Happy reading. (Warning: pdf)

285 Upvotes

83 comments sorted by

View all comments

62

u/rastamasta45 Jun 20 '26

I’m so tired of hearing “they’ll just ban anyway with majority” this is besides the point. The reality is this program is a walking corpse, barely able to round up the troops, enforcement is non-existent.

They can ban everything if we win, then they’re in the same damn place as they are now. Who’s doing the collecting, who’s doing the prosecuting, and who’s willing to see a couple ruby ridge throughout Canada.

The entire police in this country already said fuck off, a bill won’t change that.

19

u/Dill_Pickle_Tears Jun 20 '26

Yup. It also just hurts the cause. The users here arent stupid, we already know this is possible so it’s a moot point.

Hope keeps the morale up and the black pilled rhetoric only plays into the hands of the policy makers

18

u/rastamasta45 Jun 20 '26

Bingo, it’s a defeatist mentality. Not to mention a main grievance of the separatist movement is the gun ban, for carney to say “we lost the case, now I’m moving forward with the same ban” will only super charge the separatists.