CANADIAN COALITION FOR FIREARM RIGHTS, RODNEY GILTACA, RYAN STEACY, MACCABEE DEFENSE INC. and WOLVERINE SUPPLIES LTD. v Canada

[u/airchinapilot]

https://www.scc-csc.ca/pdf/case-documents/41859/FM010_Appellant_Canadian-Coalition-for-Firearm-Rights.pdf?fbclid=IwY2xjawSjj-BleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZBAyMjIwMzkxNzg4MjAwODkyAAEeANXl0iXLYQJAzWAacwJ3jlAPA2JwySXYmO2kdN61vIzfl36nYz2DnLqmuZU_aem_KMNtV2EKNmsPofG7UrsqMA

This is the written argument to be heard by the Supreme Court of Canada by the CCFR and associated parties v Canada. Happy reading. (Warning: pdf)

[u/rastamasta45]

I’m so tired of hearing “they’ll just ban anyway with majority” this is besides the point. The reality is this program is a walking corpse, barely able to round up the troops, enforcement is non-existent.

They can ban everything if we win, then they’re in the same damn place as they are now. Who’s doing the collecting, who’s doing the prosecuting, and who’s willing to see a couple ruby ridge throughout Canada.

The entire police in this country already said fuck off, a bill won’t change that.

[u/boozefiend3000 → u/rastamasta45]

They’ll ban and just grandfather. It’s still a win for them. No more money to waste and everything is still banned. Like I said earlier, the only reason the buyback exists is because of Trudeaus vanity. 

[u/boozefiend3000 → u/[deleted]]

There was never a grandfather with use clause. The original OIC banned them from being bought, transferred or used. Originally it was safe queen grandfathering with an optional buyback 

[u/SlowDebate3165 → u/[deleted]]

No. Pressure from Carney.

He doesn't need provost anymore. Stop pretending this isn't something he wants. He literally refused to end it after Gary told him to behind closed doors.

Does nobody remember the goddamn leaked audio????

[u/Hopeful_Relation_441 → u/SlowDebate3165]

he needed poly fundraising abilities