r/canadaguns • u/SuccessSeparate9014 • Jun 13 '26

Misc Crypto Question

Post image

If the ccfr win the case. Will crypto owners need to legally register the crypto as a ar15 or would owners be in possession of a legally prohibited firearm as the frt came out after the ar15 2020 prohibition.

115 Upvotes

97% Upvoted

64 comments sorted by

View all comments

32

u/Kuzuba Jun 13 '26 edited Jun 13 '26

Wasn't the crypto designed and received a NR FRT before it was added prohibited?

If that's the case then if CCFR wins it will go back to NR.

The whole "variant" bogus is precisely one of the reasons why the supreme court wants to hear this I would assume. The intentional vagueness is contrary to how good laws should be written.

Edit: thanks for the update. Im ill informed.

9

u/AdeptArt Jun 13 '26

I don’t think it had an FRT but correct me if i’m wrong 

18

u/JaxIsLoud Jun 13 '26

It did not. They shipped them prior to getting one.

12

u/ekso69 Jun 13 '26

They didn't even apply for one, I heard that straight from the owners mouth. "Doesn't have one, doesn't need one"

0

u/JaxIsLoud Jun 13 '26

That's shady as fuck. No fucks for the customer.

21

u/HatchingCougar Jun 13 '26

If it’s NR and wasn’t imported, it in fact doesn’t need one.

-9

u/Elbro_16 Jun 13 '26

But for the sake of your customers it’s better to have one before you start selling it

15

u/HatchingCougar Jun 13 '26

It’s irrelevant.   The govt isn’t banning firearms based on whether they have an FRT or not.

0

u/Elbro_16 Jun 13 '26

The fact is, it received an frt after the bans. I wouldn’t even buy the backland hunter until it gets a frt

8

u/HatchingCougar Jun 13 '26

Plenty of firearms have gotten FRTs and then shortly after been banned

Again, an FRT is irrelevant as to whether a firearm has or will be banned or not.    <- read that again, a few times if you must.