r/canadaguns • u/SuccessSeparate9014 • Jun 13 '26

Misc Crypto Question

Post image

If the ccfr win the case. Will crypto owners need to legally register the crypto as a ar15 or would owners be in possession of a legally prohibited firearm as the frt came out after the ar15 2020 prohibition.

116 Upvotes

97% Upvoted

64 comments sorted by

View all comments

35

u/Kuzuba Jun 13 '26 edited Jun 13 '26

Wasn't the crypto designed and received a NR FRT before it was added prohibited?

If that's the case then if CCFR wins it will go back to NR.

The whole "variant" bogus is precisely one of the reasons why the supreme court wants to hear this I would assume. The intentional vagueness is contrary to how good laws should be written.

Edit: thanks for the update. Im ill informed.

8

u/AdeptArt Jun 13 '26

I don’t think it had an FRT but correct me if i’m wrong 

18

u/JaxIsLoud Jun 13 '26

It did not. They shipped them prior to getting one.

29

u/milanskiv Jun 13 '26

In Canada FRT is mandatory only for export and import. You can sell domestically prior to getting a FRT entry. Liberals are , or at least were , trying to change that

12

u/JaxIsLoud Jun 13 '26

I understand this. But had they waited to get an frt they wouldnt have had so many customers who hand their gun for a short period, people who's firearm got banned in the mail. People's whos firearm got banned prior to shipping. There were also plenty of storys about people who's firearm never shipped and they did not get refunded. And frt doesn't make the gun safe from band but it does help make it feel safer.

21

u/milanskiv Jun 13 '26

Crusader game is to sell as many guns as they can before the gun gets banned, change the tooling a bit, release a new gun and do it again.

13

u/JaxIsLoud Jun 13 '26

See backland hunters showing up with chopped up crypto parts LMFAO.

6

u/AdeptArt Jun 13 '26

Do you not know anything about Crusader? I doubt they care.

9

u/HatchingCougar Jun 13 '26

Blame the govt, not the manufacturer

The manufacturer complied with the law.  To argue that they are obligated to do more than complying, is asinine 

12

u/ekso69 Jun 13 '26

They didn't even apply for one, I heard that straight from the owners mouth. "Doesn't have one, doesn't need one"

1

u/JaxIsLoud Jun 13 '26

That's shady as fuck. No fucks for the customer.

21

u/HatchingCougar Jun 13 '26

If it’s NR and wasn’t imported, it in fact doesn’t need one.

-9

u/Elbro_16 Jun 13 '26

But for the sake of your customers it’s better to have one before you start selling it

13

u/HatchingCougar Jun 13 '26

It’s irrelevant.   The govt isn’t banning firearms based on whether they have an FRT or not.

0

u/Elbro_16 Jun 13 '26

The fact is, it received an frt after the bans. I wouldn’t even buy the backland hunter until it gets a frt

9

u/HatchingCougar Jun 13 '26

Plenty of firearms have gotten FRTs and then shortly after been banned

Again, an FRT is irrelevant as to whether a firearm has or will be banned or not.    <- read that again, a few times if you must.