r/canadaguns May 27 '26

Feets / Collection / My build Since We’re Posting Valmets

Post image

Stamped receiver M78. In typical Finnish fashion this thing chucks brass 20+ yards.

Side note I’m currently experimenting with 7.62 Galatz magazines. Wondering if the magazine geometry on Zastava M77 magazines might also work?

351 Upvotes

25 comments sorted by

49

u/Murray3-Dvideos May 27 '26

Why a Canadian hasn't molested one of these into a PSL clone is beyond me. I was going to buy one from the Shooting Edge back in the 2010s for 2600cad to do just that. But after handling and examining I determined 2 to 3000 was too much for a well used proprietary AK. Guess I should regret that decision now.

22

u/boozefiend3000 May 27 '26

You fucked up huge lol that was a steal 

13

u/Murray3-Dvideos May 27 '26

Not until 2025. Before that people only really bought Valmets to make Galil clones.

14

u/boozefiend3000 May 27 '26

Was still a steal. Valmets were going for like 12k 8 years ago on CGN

3

u/Evilstib May 28 '26

I thought a guy just said that he paid 6KUSD in February? Did I misinterpret?

3

u/boozefiend3000 May 28 '26

He bought it off someone in the states. Whole different price market 

1

u/Evilstib May 28 '26

So you can buy it off someone in the states for 6K, but to buy it from someone in Canada is 12 K? Does duty/import taxes make up the difference?

1

u/boozefiend3000 May 28 '26

I dunno. Maybe people just don’t want the hassle of importing

2

u/Evilstib May 28 '26

Sounds about right

2

u/Ok-Community-3922 May 27 '26

Plan is to use an AK Mastermount to attach an NPZ PO to this one.

I think an even cooler option would be a Yugo M76 clone with a ZRAK 4x optic on it.

19

u/Relevant_Diver_3228 May 27 '26

So why are these not banned as ak variants i don't think that they should be i just want to know why they are safe

67

u/Ok-Raise-5115 May 27 '26

Cuz the government supplied them to natives and we all know the government is never wrong

35

u/hellfire-r9x May 27 '26

Funny how there's a buyback for guns the government never touched but explicitly not for the ones they supplied.

15

u/boozefiend3000 May 27 '26

Such a pathetic country 

29

u/Ok-Community-3922 May 27 '26

Officially they are exempted in law by name. Multiple theories exist however no one theory has been independently confirmed.

(1) Some government MP possessed a Valmet M78 and Valmet Hunter at the time the SOR prescribing AKs as prohibited was dropped. This theory hearkens from the fact that both the Hunter and M78 were included in the original SOR but were later removed and exempted. This would lead me to believe that someone on the inside lobbied the government to do so.

(2) the Feds purchased a large quantity of these firearms for Native communities IOT support treaty hunting rights in the 1970s and 1980s. Similar to where we presently stand with the SKS, it would’ve been an unnecessary infringement detrimental to political capital with no reasonable prospect of compliance from Northern communities to arbitrarily prohibit them.

5

u/Relevant_Diver_3228 May 27 '26

thank you for this detailed response from what i can find online they did get givent to indigenous people but were then banned with other aks in 1994 but then in 1998 the hunter and m78 were taken off of the ban list

6

u/Perfect_Diamond_1128 May 27 '26

they were given to first nations groups by the government i think

3

u/marston82 May 27 '26

Officially and legally, they are legal because the government says they are.

0

u/DontBeWaves May 27 '26

Shut up and stop talking about it lol, we’re going to give them more ideas.

9

u/[deleted] May 27 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

8

u/lerch_up_north lost in the praries May 27 '26

Ultimately it's still just a .308 RPK 🤷‍♂️

1

u/Gonky69 May 28 '26

“Congrats” “Happy for you” “Wish it was mine.”

1

u/ellibor May 27 '26

Is that chambered in 30hate?