That literally makes no fucking sense, so these are weapons not suitable for hunting, but you can hunt until October with it and after that date 10 years in prison….make it make sense.
This would also be a good angle for the SCC to argue in their case, assuming they don't just bend the knee to the liberals.
"You said these weren't hunting rifles, yet then made an allowance for certain individuals to continue hunting with them, since they were their hunting rifles".
The ideological idiocy is mind boggling sometimes.
The CCFR is already using that argument in their lawsuit. The Supreme Court has agreed to hear their appeal. The court doesn't "argue their case": they make a decision based on the arguments presented by the parties.
218
u/rastamasta45 Apr 08 '26
That literally makes no fucking sense, so these are weapons not suitable for hunting, but you can hunt until October with it and after that date 10 years in prison….make it make sense.