r/canadaguns • u/Spread-Hour • Apr 04 '26

Application / Regulation advice Policy question regarding 'antique' status on firearms.

Why do antique models of firearms (m1861 springfield rifle and colt m1861 navy for example) made before 1898 qualify as 'antique', while the exact same models produced in 1899 or later qualify as non restricted and restricted firearms? Sorry if this sounds dumb, but I dont understand the logic here. I would understand if they weren't muzzleloaders, which load, shoot, and preform nearly the same as every other type (flint/wheel/match/serpentine-lock), but unlike the rest, cant be antique while being repros. why?

(P.S this is a repost of my post from r/canadianlaw)

13 Upvotes

86% Upvoted

33 comments sorted by

View all comments

73

u/84camaroguy Apr 04 '26

There is no logic. Don’t look for logic in Canadian firearms law.

24

u/Status_Ticket5044 Apr 04 '26

A year ago I'd have said you're being flippant and reactionary but after a year with an RPAL, you are correct. There is absolutely no logic or consistency in Canadian firearms law or classification. It's not hyperbole.

2

u/84camaroguy Apr 05 '26

Welcome aboard. I’ve said the same thing to many friends and they only seem to understand after they get a PAL and start paying attention.