r/canadaguns • u/Spread-Hour • Apr 04 '26
Application / Regulation advice Policy question regarding 'antique' status on firearms.
Why do antique models of firearms (m1861 springfield rifle and colt m1861 navy for example) made before 1898 qualify as 'antique', while the exact same models produced in 1899 or later qualify as non restricted and restricted firearms? Sorry if this sounds dumb, but I dont understand the logic here. I would understand if they weren't muzzleloaders, which load, shoot, and preform nearly the same as every other type (flint/wheel/match/serpentine-lock), but unlike the rest, cant be antique while being repros. why?
(P.S this is a repost of my post from r/canadianlaw)
12
Upvotes
5
u/Fine-Tie2651 Apr 04 '26
Did you just get your pal within the last year? Because it sounds like it with that statement. Canadian firearms law although often nonsensical is sometimes still designed to restrict widespread ownership. For example the 18.5” minimum barrel length for semi autos was introduced for two reasons. 1.The m1 carbine was widely available and was - light semi auto and had a detachable magazine. But its barrel was 16” 2. The minimum barrel length in the US for rifles before becoming a SBR was 16”.
Making the minimum barrel length 18.5” puts most American semi autos out of reach for non restricteds. This law is no mistake and neither is the antique laws. Having said this, the antique laws are designed specifically to keep newly and mass manufactured concealable handguns out of the general populace.